Hi Thorsten, okay, so you have to wait until someone with a big machine tries it. I may be able to download planet data, but I cannot run mkgmap on a file containing planet boundaries. My machine has max. ~3GB java heap available, that was just enough for europe boundary data. Sorry ! Gerd
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:38:48 +0100 From: kukuk@suse.de To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH] Again NullPointerException
On Sat, Feb 11, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi Thorsten,
I still don't understand. If you enable assertions and you hit one, the program stops and you will have incomplete data. It makes no sense to use that data or compare sizes.
Correct, and I didn't compared that.
If you disable assertions, the program should finish (both r2205 and the patched version) and I don't expect different file sizes. I don't understand yet how you can run into the assertion with my patch applied If your input file is not too big, I like to try it.
As written: it's the planet file from yesterday.
Thorsten
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:54:47 +0100 From: kukuk@suse.de To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH] Again NullPointerException
On Sat, Feb 11, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi Thorsten,
I think something must be wrong. I would not expect a change in file sizes and I did not see one in my test data. The patch verify_boundary_v3.patch doesn't remove any data, so I assume that you have applied one of the older patches. Can you please verify that ? The correct patch contains a line with Collections.reverse(coords);
Yes, I only applied the correct patch.
The only difference between your tests and my I see is, that I run into this assert check. Maybe that makes the difference?
Thorsten
Gerd
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:49:59 +0100 From: kukuk@suse.de To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH] Again NullPointerException
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 09, GerdP wrote:
Hi,
as a result of previous discussions here is th new patch.
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5471749/verify_boundary_v3.patch verify_boundary_v3.patch
With mkgmap-r2205, with and without this patch, I get an expecption on the planet data from 2012-02-10:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.AssertionError at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryUtil.loadBoundaryFile(BoundaryUtil.java:145)
If I disable the assert, mkgmap-r2205 finishes building boundarys without problems.
There is only one big difference in the boundary data: The boundary data created by mkgmap with this patch is 15% smaller than the one created without this patch.
I don't know how to compare best which data is missing, but I think 15% is a lot. Or is this expected?
Thorsten
-- Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev