Hi Gerd, Oké, now I understand. Yes, motorway is a routable way. highway=primary [0x10000 resolution 18-19 continue with_actions] highway=primary [0x10014 resolution 20-21 continue with_actions] highway=primary & bicycle!=no [0x03 road_class=0 road_speed=1 resolution 22 continue with_actions] Ehhh, NO...!!! [bicycle=no] will NOT set road_class and road_speed. So my primary is NOT routable. Also my motorway is NOT routable. highway=motorway [0x10000 resolution 18-19 continue with_actions] highway=motorway [0x10014 resolution 20-21 continue with_actions] So: ( highway=* & bicycle=no | highway=motorway ) are NOT routable.
and that the via points are at the same place?
Absolute position waypoint/viapoint is 100% identical (same point), but relative position to highway might be different IF highway nodes have been relocated by mkgmap (???, remember ???). But I have been playing around with via-point position. Mkgmap will always use the motorway, unless the via-point is closer to another highway not having bicycle=no.
My understanding is that the Garmin routing algo ignores all restrictions when the via or target point is only reachable on a "prohibited" road.
I don't know or understand. What I do know: all [highway=service], [surface=sand/gravel], [highway=steps], [route=ferry] is SET to "mkgmap:unpaved". Therefore I need to explicitly PUT a via-point ON the ferry before the ferry will be used for navigation. But these highway are routable therefore I can force navigation on these highways. Anyway: my question is not about my own map. Now I understand it's thanks to the non routable highways my GPS won't send my ON a motorway. Question is: Is it oké (by design) makgmap-default-style will navigate me using a motorway IF (and only IF) I put a VIA-point on TOP of the motorway? I admit: that's my error. But mkgmap-BaseCamp-GPS should help me and tell me: "Don't be stupid, Eric!" -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html