Ok Thanks


On 05/03/2017 09:34, Gerd Petermann [via GIS] wrote:
Hi Nick,

hmm, not sure what you want to point out.
The tag mkgmap:residential may be set to other values than "yes", e.g.
ways located in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454954092
should have mkgmap:residential=Bahnhofsviertel

Gerd
________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von nwillink <[hidden email]>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. März 2017 10:27:03
An: [hidden email]
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential

Thanks Gerd

Works a treat although in my style I had to use

building=* & mkgmap:residential=yes {delete building}

in both polygons and lines (outlines).

Your efforts provide an addiitional  bonus in that you may just want to show
just the faint outlines of buildings.

Perhaps with some coding you could make exceptions for buildings in
villages/hamlets...

Nick





--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892424.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev



If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892425.html
To unsubscribe from [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential, click here.
NAML



View this message in context: Re: [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.