data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Ben, I've already mentioned that setaccess no will not work when the way has explicit tags like bicycle=yes as it only sets the values prefixed with mkgmap: The rules in inc/access will ignore this bec ause of this block which is evaluated later: foot=* { set mkgmap:foot='${foot}' } bicycle=* { set mkgmap:bicycle='${bicycle}' } motorcar=* { set mkgmap:car='${motorcar}' } goods=* { set mkgmap:delivery='${goods}' } hgv=* { set mkgmap:truck='${hgv}' } bus=* { set mkgmap:bus='${bus}' } taxi=* { set mkgmap:taxi='${taxi}' } emergency=* { set mkgmap:emergency='${emergency}' } I think the docu for the "setaccess no" action is very clear, but its name is very misleading :-( I think the only intended usage was in the rules which helped to use an old style (inc/compat_lines) Gerd ________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ben Konrath <ben@bagu.org> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 09:28 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways For people who have issues with Gerd's implement (line is in NET but not in NOD): What do you think about my original suggestion of adding "setaccess 'no';" to highway=construction? Thanks, Ben On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Gerd Petermann <GPetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com<mailto:GPetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com>> wrote: Hi Chris, glad to see that you did not use the mkgmap: prefix ;-) Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> im Auftrag von chris66 <chris66nrw@gmx.de<mailto:chris66nrw@gmx.de>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2015 10:52 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways Am 16.10.2015 um 20:46 schrieb Alexandre Loss:
I agree also that "mkgmap:ignore-for-routing=yes" is more clear.
I used this tag already in OSM to mark isolated ways. :-) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111674198#map=18/54.3354/8.5915 Chris _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev