Henning Scholland wrote
My intention with this message is: If you find that a way is missing in the map, you should first check if splitter complained with such a message. The problem is, that the complete way isn't rendered, if only one node is missing. I don't know if it would be good, if mkgmap skip missing nodes. It could course other problems.
Really? I was not aware of this. I thought that mkgmap requires only those points that fall into the bbox saved with the tile (the one that has overlap=0) plus for cross-tile-ways, the next nodes outside of the bbox are needed to calculate the position of the way, but anything else should be obsolete if the way is not a closed way. Am I wrong? Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/splitter-r239-tp5736433p5736510.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.