Hi WanMil, I tested using Windows-1250 charset and also UTF-8 - same result. I tested it on Garmin Colorado device. Marek 2013/10/22 WanMil <wmgcnfg@web.de>
Hi Marek,
I compiled Slovakia with logging enabled and the bounds file from Oct 4th: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.LocationHook.results.level=FINE
The results for Trenčianska are: W 21390051 ;;Nivy;Ružinov;okres Bratislava II;;Bratislava;;Bratislavský kraj;;SVK;;
This means for the way with id 21390051 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/21390051) the following mkgmap:admin_levelN are used: admin_level2=SVK admin_level4=Bratislavský kraj admin_level6=Bratislava admin_level8=okres Bratislava II admin_level9=Ružinov admin_level10=Nivy
The street can be found in MapSource. Anyhow street name is Trencianska. But I have compiled the map with latin1 character set. Maybe you are using a different one?
WanMil
For example when you search for Trenčianska street in Bratislava, the street is not in list. I am sure it is in the map and could be found in index when cutting some small rectangle from the osm map of Slovakia.
2013/10/18 WanMil <wmgcnfg@web.de <mailto:wmgcnfg@web.de>>
> First is probably related to: > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2013q2/017760.html > > I have missing streets in Bratislava (Slovakia) in index. But I am not > sure whether is is only in Bratislava (which uses districts). I tried to > compile only partial map (cut off from Slovakian map) containing only > corresponding part of Bratislava and streets are there. My address setup > in style file is like this: > > # Slovakia > mkgmap:country=SVK & mkgmap:city!=* & mkgmap:admin_level6=* { set > mkgmap:city='${mkgmap:admin_level6}' } > mkgmap:country=SVK & mkgmap:city!=* & mkgmap:admin_level9=* { set > mkgmap:city='${mkgmap:admin_level9}' } > mkgmap:country=SVK & mkgmap:city!=* & mkgmap:admin_level8=* { set > mkgmap:city='${mkgmap:admin_level8}' } > > ... which is with high probability correct.
Can you give some examples which streets cannot be found? What are you searching for? What is the result? What do you expect?
WanMil _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev