On 04.02.2011 08:12, Henning Scholland wrote:
Am 03.02.2011 22:36, schrieb Marko Mäkelä:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 05:02:43PM +0100, Torsten Leistikow wrote:
For some types this might be ok, but for some types I do not want the symbol in addition to the polygon. For some minor map features, I would want only the symbol, not the polygon. For example, mappers could start drawing bus stop shelters from Bing aerial images. The shelters would be smaller than the Garmin map resolution, and thus the POI would be enough. Did you try my "hack" with a transparent polygon?
All in all I think the best would be an action in polygon-style for creating a POI.
Henning
I often would like to have only Polygon, but no POI. transparent is possible, but not nice, as at least on old GPS it slows them down.... A seperate style-file file would be best... For me the reason to use add-pois-to-areas is that I want to be able to find certain stuff via search function, but actually I would even prefer not to have a seperate POI. As that is not possible AFAIK (searching for POI that do not exist in the map but only some indexes - which is what I really would like to have) - at least not have a myriad of POI on top and a seperate file would be needed (twould probably for me cut the number of POI from polygons by 50%).
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev