Hi Gerd
I've for the time being abandoned the admin_level idea but I'm sure its possible - around my area most levels are admin_level 10
I have had various thoughts
1) Some buildings may be more important than others, ie pubs ;) so I've been tinkering with excluding them from the residential list -
2) In many ways using a TYP file its very useful to be able to distinguish between residential (faint no outline) and non residential buildings ( darker with outline)
3) Buildings in industrial / educational areas are still shown, but that is not a problem ; I can see a possible use for mkgmap:industrial / mkgmap:leisure etc but that may be over the top.
4) Exeter is 'plagued' with buildings and the residential rule
seems to have excluded them all !
r
Nick
I'd also like to know if it you have an idea how to improve the usability in case that it doesn't work ;-)
Gerd
________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von nwillink <[hidden email]>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. März 2017 12:53:04
An: [hidden email]
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential
Hi Gerd
Thanks for the suggestion - will let you know when successful
r
Nick
On 05/03/2017 11:43, Gerd Petermann [via GIS] wrote:
Hi Nick,
maybe you can check mkgmap:admin_level9..11 to decide if an element is in a village?
Gerd
________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892434&i=0>> im Auftrag von nwillink <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892434&i=1>>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. März 2017 11:46:56
An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892434&i=2>
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential
Ok Gerd
I didn't realise that , no wonder I'm having problems
Thanks for looking into that.
On 05/03/2017 10:44, Gerd Petermann [via GIS] wrote:
Nick, sorry, I don't get it.
With the patch the value in the new tag mkgmap:residential is evaluated before any style rule is used.
I see no way for you to pass the information from a node or way with place=village to another element with building=*
Gerd
________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892430&i=0>> im Auftrag von nwillink <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892430&i=1>>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. März 2017 11:32:14
An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892430&i=2>
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential
Gerd, that is a good point
It was just a thought that since points are parsed first one could perhaps set a flag when place=village is true
then
mkgmap:residiential=* & village=true . --> show buildings
So I was not thinking of mkgmap specifically
On 05/03/2017 10:08, Gerd Petermann [via GIS] wrote:
Please explain what you meant with
"Perhaps with some coding you could make exceptions for buildings in
villages/hamlets..."
Would that be code in mkgmap or in your style?
Gerd
________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892427&i=0>> im Auftrag von nwillink <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892427&i=1>>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. März 2017 11:03:56
An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892427&i=2>
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential
Ok Thanks
On 05/03/2017 09:34, Gerd Petermann [via GIS] wrote:
Hi Nick,
hmm, not sure what you want to point out.
The tag mkgmap:residential may be set to other values than "yes", e.g.
ways located in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454954092
should have mkgmap:residential=Bahnhofsviertel
Gerd
________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892425&i=0>> im Auftrag von nwillink <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892425&i=1>>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. März 2017 10:27:03
An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892425&i=2>
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential
Thanks Gerd
Works a treat although in my style I had to use
building=* & mkgmap:residential=yes {delete building}
in both polygons and lines (outlines).
Your efforts provide an addiitional bonus in that you may just want to show
just the faint outlines of buildings.
Perhaps with some coding you could make exceptions for buildings in
villages/hamlets...
Nick
--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892424.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892425&i=3>
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892425&i=4>
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
________________________________
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892425.html
To unsubscribe from [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential, click here.
NAML<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
________________________________
View this message in context: Re: [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892426.html>
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892427&i=3>
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
________________________________
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892427.html
To unsubscribe from [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential, click here.
NAML<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
________________________________
View this message in context: Re: [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892429.html>
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892430&i=3>
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
________________________________
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892430.html
To unsubscribe from [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential, click here.
NAML<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
________________________________
View this message in context: Re: [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892431.html>
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892434&i=3>
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
________________________________
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892434.html
To unsubscribe from [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential, click here.
NAML<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
________________________________
View this message in context: Re: [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892437.html>
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892465.html