Has anyone been looking into this ? The number of ways excluded because of this is rather large, here is an example of iso-nl-011.osm : -- Ways 82, interesting 75, discarded (missing node) 34 Thanks, Danny On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 10:37 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
My buildmap has a large number of errors like : Invalid way 6295259 due to missing node 46787599 Invalid way 6295259 due to missing node 46788476
That comes from the scan of iso-nl-011.osm .
When I scan the split files, this is confirmed :
pavilion: {1267} fgrep 46787599 nl.tmp/*.osm nl.tmp/iso-nl-011.osm:<nd ref='46787599'/> nl.tmp/iso-nl-011.osm:<nd ref='46787599'/> nl.tmp/iso-nl-036.osm:<nd ref='46787599'/> nl.tmp/iso-nl-036.osm:<nd ref='46787599'/> nl.tmp/iso-nl-052.osm:<node id='46787599' lat='52.5065000' lon='4.5992000'/> nl.tmp/iso-nl-052.osm:<nd ref='46787599'/> nl.tmp/iso-nl-052.osm:<nd ref='46787599'/> nl.tmp/iso-nl-076.osm:<node id='46787599' lat='52.5065000' lon='4.5992000'/> nl.tmp/iso-nl-076.osm:<nd ref='46787599'/> nl.tmp/iso-nl-076.osm:<nd ref='46787599'/> nl.tmp/iso-nl-172.osm:<node id='46787599' lat='52.5065000' lon='4.5992000'/> nl.tmp/iso-nl-172.osm:<nd ref='46787599'/> nl.tmp/iso-nl-172.osm:<nd ref='46787599'/> nl.tmp/iso-nl-174.osm:<node id='46787599' lat='52.5065000' lon='4.5992000'/> nl.tmp/iso-nl-174.osm:<nd ref='46787599'/> nl.tmp/iso-nl-174.osm:<nd ref='46787599'/> pavilion: {1268}
So not all the split files that require info about a node (they have an "nd") also got the "node".
What's wrong ?
Danny
-- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info