ops - you must be right! thanks

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi Enrico,

splitter r412 should produce fewer tiles, so one explanation might be that the last for
tiles were not produced by r412. Since your listing shows different timestamps for them
I'd say you did not start with a clean directory.

Gerd


Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 00:03:15 +0200
From: eliboni@gmail.com
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Subject: [mkgmap-dev] gmappsupp size with 20% bigger when using latest splitter


I updated my splitter version from 314 to 412 - now, it's pretty late but I read about the new split algorithm that might cause some different sizes than before,  maybe I searched too quickly but I can't seem to explain why the final gmapsupp went from  87MB  to 107MB.

Looking at the split output in 412 and 314, it's clear 412 creates bigger files. Strange enough the last 4 files have the same size...

# splitter 412
 10637241 oct 22 23:23 70600001.osm.pbf
 12379309 oct 22 23:23 70600002.osm.pbf
 12233125 oct 22 23:23 70600003.osm.pbf
 12607475 oct 22 23:23 70600004.osm.pbf
 14031652 oct 22 23:23 70600005.osm.pbf
 12025643 oct 22 23:23 70600006.osm.pbf
  9286836 oct 22 23:23 70600007.osm.pbf
 11071432 oct 22 23:23 70600008.osm.pbf
 11720495 oct 22 23:23 70600009.osm.pbf
 11909440 oct 22 23:23 70600010.osm.pbf
 12356777 oct 22 23:23 70600011.osm.pbf
 11513810 oct 22 23:23 70600012.osm.pbf
 11672847 oct 22 23:23 70600013.osm.pbf
 11988497 oct 22 23:23 70600014.osm.pbf
  9209424 oct 22 22:28 70600015.osm.pbf
 11793063 oct 22 22:28 70600016.osm.pbf
 10161776 oct 22 22:28 70600017.osm.pbf
 10080071 oct 22 22:28 70600018.osm.pbf


# splitter 314
  7323072 oct 22 23:43 70600001.osm.pbf
  8832797 oct 22 23:43 70600002.osm.pbf
  9987720 oct 22 23:43 70600003.osm.pbf
  8862868 oct 22 23:43 70600004.osm.pbf
  7198648 oct 22 23:43 70600005.osm.pbf
  9651244 oct 22 23:43 70600006.osm.pbf
 10898020 oct 22 23:43 70600007.osm.pbf
  9764169 oct 22 23:43 70600008.osm.pbf
  8247811 oct 22 23:43 70600009.osm.pbf
  9444801 oct 22 23:43 70600010.osm.pbf
  8876247 oct 22 23:43 70600011.osm.pbf
  9218641 oct 22 23:43 70600012.osm.pbf
  7222814 oct 22 23:43 70600013.osm.pbf
  9883513 oct 22 23:43 70600014.osm.pbf
  9209424 oct 22 23:43 70600015.osm.pbf
 11793063 oct 22 23:43 70600016.osm.pbf
 10161776 oct 22 23:43 70600017.osm.pbf
 10080071 oct 22 23:43 70600018.osm.pbf


Does this sound right to you?

Thanks!
Enrico


_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev