Hi Steve, okay, fine. Any ideas for the names of the sub classes? I am not so sure that we should call 0 an invalid number, I think I read somewhere that 0 is used. Taginfo also reports that, but that doesn't mean they are correct, as I also see -1 in Canvec imports. Gerd Steve Ratcliffe wrote
I'm all for using Numbers as the top level class name.
You probably noticed that I added a check for negative and zero number in netcheck. Found a few in a UK map, so good catch.
..Steve
So, maybe we should keep the name Numbers for the topmost class as it also coresponds to the name in the polish format?
Gerd
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@.org
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@.org
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Patch-v2-and-thoughts-about-class-names-tp584... Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.