data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Marko,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:11:25AM +0100, Gerd Petermann wrote:
attached is version 2 of the patch which checks only first and last node of a road.
Thanks! I finally tested this, and it looked OK with my fabricated data and style file patch, which did { add fixme=yes } to some nodes.
Great! Thanks for the feedback.
Please check: I think the code in RouteNode.reportDeadEnds() does not report a dead end oneway if the routeNode contains a normal (twoway) road because both flags noWayOut and noWayIn are set to false in this case. Is this intended?
I did not implement the dead-end checks. I believe it was Mark Burton, who no longer is active in the project. Can you draw ASCII art of the
Sorry for the confusion, seems I read the name marbb as marko.
= means two-way road
means one-way road | means dead-end
The cases |==== or ====| should not emit any warning; these should be common for highway=residential and highway=service etc.
====>>>>>| should emit a warning 'goes nowhere' ====<<<<<| should emit a warning 'comes from nowhere' ====>>>>>==== no warning ====<<<<<==== no warning
This is my reasoning; I did not test the actual behaviour. Which case did you have in mind?
I don't have a picture in mind. I found the problem while testing the patch. I used a download containing both ways and removed one. To my surprise I did not see the expected message from the dead-end check. I added option --report-dead-ends=2 and still got no message. So I looked at the source and found what I reported. I'll have a closer look today. Gerd
Marko _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev