data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Ticker, OK, maybe you find more on that. BTW: Voßberg is very special as it probably also influences the MDR 17 content. I think I'll merge the faster-mp branch into trunk this afternoon and continue on the Huffman encoding later. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap@jagit.co.uk> Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Januar 2022 12:01 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Fix and augment sort definitions Hi Gerd I'm just building your area to test on my UK configured devices. I'm not sure yet of the benefit of testing with the mdr2 branch. Actually, until we've better understood the indexing issues thrown up by use of --lower-case, the extra complications of ß seem too much. Ticker On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 09:50 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi Ticker,
I think you need option -g with svn log to see changes done in branches.
Anyhow, I think I made a mistake back then because I didn't think of devices which are not configured to show a German keyboard (which has keys for äöü and ß).
You are probably right that the expands are better for this case and I don't remember what problems I had with the ß. It is very likely that the open collator strength questions are the better approach.
I test with a tile around my hometown Wildeshausen 55410043: 2447360,389120 to 2469888,407552 # : 52.514648,8.349609 to 52.998047,8.745117
One problem that I found on the Oregon is the search for a name that appears as a nearby city called "Voßberg" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/599127249
This name doesn't appear in the Oregons basemap. I created a map with --latin and --lower-case. When I search for Voß it is not found. Same when I search for Voßber. Only the search for the full name works. Voss is also not found, but Vossberg works.
Without the patch, search for Voß returns Voßberg, search for Vossberg does that also, which is quite confusing for me. My basemap shows --------- Description ----------------------------------------------- ----------- 00000035 | 41 53 43 49 49 20 53 6f | Description: ASCII Sort 0000003d | 72 74 00 | --------- Character table header ------------------------------------ ----------- 00000040 | 000000 | 5c 00 | sub header len 92 00000042 | 000002 | 01 00 | id1 1 00000044 | 000004 | 01 00 | id2 1 00000046 | 000006 | e4 04 | codepage 1252
Maybe I should repeat those tests with the mdr2 branch?
Gerd
________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap@jagit.co.uk> Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Januar 2022 09:40 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Fix and augment sort definitions
Hi Gerd
Sorry - I hadn't noticed these changes. They don't show up with $ svn log resources/sort/cp1252.txt or cp1254.txt
All the other mkgmap sort files have all the expansions possible including the eszett and diphthongs if applicable.
The two non-mkgmap sort files (0000848.SRT/Turkey and I00003A0.SRT/adriatic TOPO) have expand for "ß" and some of "Œ"... so I presumed it was expected and reasonably supported.
In the binaries, the expand is expressed as a list of sortOrders {primary,secondary,tertiary}. The secondary and tertiary are disrupted and don't match ones from actual characters (in the case of "ß", the two s's get different secondaries). So these double chars will sort after the real char and only match with PRIMARY.
As there many unknowns about how to make --lower-case indexing work and the setting, regarding collation strength, of the bit-flag indicating same-name in some of the MDR sections, I feel that it is better to have the all the expands.
However, if you are against this, I'll redo cp1252 without these expansions. I'm not sure of the basis of having the diphthongs as alternate secondaries of their first character and the eszett as a unique character.
Ticker
On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 11:44 +0100, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi Ticker,
see https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=3948 https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=3949
the sortResource.patch reverts these changes.
In Mapsource the results are a bit better with your patch. I'll try again with my Oregon later.
Gerd _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev