Hi Felix, On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 04:50:34PM +0100, Felix Hartmann wrote:
It would be better to have more aggressive dp-filter instead. As I wrote a while back, the increase of the dp filter in low resolutions has to be much higher. Currently a level of 10 is very good, but too strong for resolutions 23-21 and a bit too strong for 20.
Better compared to what? Currently, all other water features are at resolution 18, while natural=coastline is at resolution=12. Resolution 12 means that all lakes that are mapped as natural=coastline will show up and seriously slow down the map drawing at wide zoom. It is just plain illogical that some water features disappear but others do not. It could be nice to have presets for resolutions in the style file, so that you could say 'resolution water' in all map features and define 'water' as 18, for instance. Marko