Am 17.04.2011 10:21, schrieb Marko Mäkelä:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 09:04:18AM +0200, Josef Latt wrote:
Am 16.04.2011 17:10, schrieb Josef Latt:
Or, a member of a relation is a highway and the relation itself has tag highway=.. both ways lie upon each other. Maybe there can be solution in the styles. But this is to high for me.
Example for the above und BTW I don't understand the scope of such constructs. http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.5721489&lon=7.2946530&zoom=18
I downloaded this in JOSM. The landuse=residential multipolygon http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1535811 looks incorrect.
I guess that you are referring to the highway=pedestrian multipolygon on the west. Its west border is a way that has highway=service. Pedestrian areas are a normal thing to have, but I would not use highways as area borders. The highway line should be drawn on the centerline of way, and I would expect the pedestrian plaza to be separated from the centerline of the highway=service in some way. Either the highway=service way is completely inside the highway=pedestrian area, or the highway=service way should be completely outside the pedestrian area.
Yes, that's one thing. The other is the complete construct, which consists of 3 relations. IMHO an overkill as well as other simple areas in this region which are mapped as multipolygons. I would prefer, mapping the hole area as amenity=school and highways and building on it. Because of those constructs I voted for this option meaning that than I have in may card only the highways. The multipolygons are drawn with ways without tags. Are they gone too with this patch: When not how can I do this?
In other words, this looks like bad mapping. If you feed this to any software, you can expect GIGO (garbage in, garbage out).
ACK Josef -- PGP Schlüssel: 311D1055 http://keyserver.pgp.com