29 Sep
2009
29 Sep
'09
5:34 p.m.
Felix Hartmann schrieb:
No, not the first. I want that it stops after the first matching. So if the first matches, 2 and 3 are dropped. if 2 matches 3 is dropped.
With the "first rule matching", I was referring to your example, where the first rule was already matching.
Hope to have made clear what I think would be important. Actually the strict order is the least important for me.
If you extend your styles with such auxiliary flags, it can only work, if the execution order for the rules is guaranteed. And I do not see any possibility, how you can implement your naming scheme without a strict ordering. Gruss Torsten