On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 02:37:42PM +0200, Valentijn Sessink wrote:
Marko Mäkelä schreef:
I am planning to remove the { add bicycle=no; add foot=no } from highway=trunk and to restore non-bicycle paths to road_speed=0.
I'd suggest you don't. I do not know why bicycle routing differs. Adding random patches to my random reports won't help.
It is not totally random. Someone just yelled that defaulting bicycle=no on highway=trunk is not right, and I cannot disagree with that. If there is no traffic sign that prohibits bicycles and pedestrians, then they are allowed. And I haven't seen such traffic signs in Finland, except in some places when there is a cycleway next to the highway=trunk.
Please note that r1431 was quite carefully engineered by Felix Hartmann (at least, that is what I understood from it), and you shouldn't change these back just because I'm yelling something ;-)
The road_speed=1 for a non-bicycle highway=path does not seem to make too much sense. It may be possible to ride some bicycles on a 20cm wide unofficial forest path, but not with a bicycle trailer or a tandem/triplet/quad or at the same speed as on a purpose-built cycleway. Maybe Felix had too much emphasis on mountain bikers?
Do you have test cases in mind? Can you try the attached patch?
I will. But not now.
No hurry, this has (or may have) been broken such a long time :-) Marko