data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/148bb/148bbf24a78fac58e786394420a6dc6eabd796f5" alt=""
b) did not work when I tried it. I have a test file here (very simple): https://openmtbmap.org/wp-content/images/debug/driveways.osm oh yeah the idea why semi_connected is needed camp up because many (mainly highway=service & service=driveway and no other tags )in France and Switzerland are actually needed to get from roads for cars onto pathes/tracks. Often through a supermarket parking or similar while highway=service & service=driveway (likewise with no other tag) but mostly connected only on one side to public roads - are used to map ways to access a private house door or garden - they really clutter up the map hence I want to remove them. And yes - sadly far too little driveways add a foot=yes or foot=designated, or access=yes/access=designated while also far too many really private ways lack a access=private. Some people in OSM understand that service=driveway means it public without other tags, while others understand that it's private. On 17 September 2017 at 18:14, Felix Hartmann <extremecarver@gmail.com> wrote:
I've seen a couple - but yes - according to taginfo it's really little, https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/service=driveway (most are highway=service, then residential and others are really really little).
do you think you can change the behavior that b) will also work? If not I'm just going to rewrite my rules for highway=service - and drop the idea to get rid of track,residential, footway and path with service=driveway tag (and hope this does not change in future). All other things that are specified in {} brackets also work like b) - that's why I thought it should work that way too.
Another possibility would be if it could be added to the finalize section instead. So have in finalize section ( highway=service | highway=track | highway=path | highway=footway | highway=residential ) & service=driveway {set mkgmap:set_semi_connected_type=none; set mkgmap:set_unconnected_type=none} which would then overrule rules given higher up. (I did not try if this will work already - but I guess not).
On 17 September 2017 at 17:33, nwillink <osm@pinns.co.uk> wrote:
Hi Gerd
In the UK , frequently public footpaths are linked to someone's driveway - I have to say it's often quite 'daunting' to walk up someone's drive in order to continue along a public footpath.
r
Nick
-- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443. html _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org Schusterbergweg 32/8 6020 Innsbruck Austria - Österreich
-- Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org Schusterbergweg 32/8 6020 Innsbruck Austria - Österreich