On 21.01.2010 18:55, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
On 21/01/10 17:28, Felix Hartmann wrote:
Not that no 0x* is included here. This would be simple and effective (and I can't think of any reason why we would need the style branch then).
We need the style branch because the trunk just doesn't work in a consistent and predictable way.
I wouldn't see (except the strange handling of oneway=reverse - but maybe there is some error on my side) any strange behaviour with the trunk currently. There would only be the need for [continue_withactions] without direct output.
I know that by adding lots of extra rules you can get almost anything to work, but you shouldn't have to do that. Perhaps the patch that was applied fixed some things and I will investigate fully before doing anything.
I could never understand exactly what problems you had with the style branch, but I am sure that they can be easily overcome once I have good examples to work with.
Well continue never worked in any way predictable and my maps were output with half of the lines missing, routing broken,.....
..Steve _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev