Hi Bernd,

thanks for testing. I'll try to find out what is special in your sample.
The numbers 116-118 form what I call a group, so are treated special.

BTW: I wonder if we need a special tag like mkgmap:allow-rename=0
to disable the naming for particular kinds of roads?
Did you find cases were the naming should not happen?

Gerd

> From: weigelt.bernd@web.de

> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 15:13:50 +0200
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] address search and mixed index
>
> Am Freitag, 3. April 2015, 17:05:08 schrieb Gerd Petermann:
> > Please try it and let me know how it works for you. If possible I'd like
> > to change the option so that it is done by default and may be switched off.
>
> Looks really good for me, found 9 of 10 addresses along the nearest renamed
> service roads
>
> here https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.65044/7.23882 was a little
> problem, didn't found Bergstraße 116-118, only Bergstraße 120 or Bergstraße
> 115. Maybe it is possible, to find Bergstraße 118 at a short part of the
> street, but i think there is also a missing part of the service road in front
> of these buildings in the database.
>
>
> Bernd
>
>
> --
> amarok2 now playing:
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev