On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:06:17 +0200, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:06:12PM +0800, maning sambale wrote:
I'm inclined to think that this is a data problem (the gate should explicitly define that is only usefule for pedestrians). I can't find the correct tagging for this one at the moment. If such tag exist, is it supported by mkgmap?
It is this gate, isn't it? http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/659516319 It has access=private, foot=yes.
Maybe mkgmap is being too liberal about the access=private (treating it like access=yes), or its logic gets confused about the controversial access keys (access=private would imply foot=private, which contradicts foot=yes). What if you remove the access=private or add motorcar=no motorcycle=no? (And while you are at it, add bicycle=yes or bicycle=no too, as appropriate.)
I'm curious how mkgmap handles "permissive," "private," and "destination" access types myself.