Thanks for this. I'd already realised a more generic approach was better than an mkgmap specific one. Thanks Paul On 12/04/13 08:25, Henning Scholland wrote:
Am 12.04.2013 00:02, schrieb News:
Like you I think this is a useful option which should stay so I guess it's down to us to drum up some action on the wiki although I'll confess that I don't know where the best place to start is as I haven't spent much time on any wiki let alone one as large and well established as OSM. However if you feel you have the knowledge to make a start point me at the relevant page and I'll gladly pitch in
Hi Paul, typical you should set up a proposal. If you search the wiki for proposal you should find the necessary information. After creating the proposal you should write to tagging-ML and partisipate in a discussion with other mappers. If this relation is already used, this discussion could be quite short. Just a hint: don't argue with 'mkgmap needs it', but say 'router will need it'. ;)
Henning
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev