are you sure this works fully?
I still have some strings in the display.jar output.
The log file from display.jar decreased by around 15% in size - but there are still entries like:
00036727 | 00300e | 4d 30 2e 20 | [1082] str: M0.
0003672b | 003012 | eb 28 | Index? 10475
0003672d | 003014 | 4d 31 2e 20 | [1083] str: M1.
00036731 | 003018 | ec 28 | Index? 10476
00036733 | 00301a | 4d 32 2e 20 | [1084] str: M2.
00036737 | 00301e | ed 28 | Index? 10477
00036739 | 003020 | 4d 33 2e 20 | [1085] str: M3.
0003673d | 003024 | ee 28 | Index? 10478
0003673f | 003026 | 4d 34 2e 20 | [1086] str: M4.
Another thing which could be optimized - no number only entries. I don*t know any country where you would have an address with the street consisting of numbers only. Maybe this should be optional with another switch?
I know addresses without a street name at all - it*s just name of the place plus a number. But I do not know streets with only number as name. Maybe some countries have that? Most definitely do no.
Even one letter and numbers is a bit strange. I think most streets have ref and name (e.g. B11 myname) - not sure if some searches for say B11 housenumber instead of myname housenumber. Maybe they would search for B11 myname housenumber.