data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Marko, I'll have a look at it. Gerd
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:03:43 +0200 From: marko.makela@iki.fi To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: [mkgmap-dev] Turn restrictions with role=via ways
Now, with all these routing improvements, I wonder if it would be possible to extend our support for turn restrictions.
Some mapper seems to prefer via ways to via nodes in this crossing:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30692839
This 2-node way is a role=via member of a no_u_turn restriction that has 4 ways as members: from,via,via,to. It is also a role=via member of a no_left_turn restriction.
The no_u_turn restriction could have been mapped with three ways as from,via,to and the no_left_turn could have been mapped with having this way as role=from, and a node as role=via. Even if I changed the map like that, mkgmap would still ignore the no_u_turn, because the role=via member would be a way.
So, I wonder if we could start supporting this style of mapping? There are lots of dual carriageways in city areas where such turn restrictions are common, at least for no_u_turn.
Marko _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev