On 30/01/10 13:58, Felix Hartmann wrote:
Continue works. But not without actions (ie it is as if without_actions is always given).
a) Sorry, are you implementing now without_actions? In the trunk with_actions means, actions get carried forward, else no actions get carried forward. I did not know that "without_actions" exists too.
No it was just a mistake, I meant it is as if with_actions is always given - I find the terminology very confusing! I would prefer that continue not change the normal effect of the actions and there be a without_actions (or no_carry_forward or no_propagate which would be more descriptive of what happens) command that prevented the carry forward. But no, I am not going to change anything unless you all want the change.
b) Are more than the first two keys read? Will the style branch accecpt say 5x =.... and 100x !=... without cutting of some of the command?
Yes it should work. Before the merge I will make a request for examples that can be made part of the testing cycle, so we can make sure that it does work before the merge. ..Steve