data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Minko, okay, got it. So maybe we have to separate the "well known" routable types 0x01 -0x13 , 0x1a, 0x1b, 0x16 from others which are also routable? Gerd ligfietser wrote
Hi Gerd,
Let me give an example when it goes wrong then: highway=unclassified [0x06 road_class=3 road_speed=2 resolution 23 continue with_actions] bicycleroute=yes [0x02 road_class=4 road_speed=3 resolution 22 continue]
I have to use continue because this rule must continue for highway=pedestrian areas which are also handled in the polygons style.
If I remove the road parameters from the second line routing breaks: bicycleroute=yes [0x02 resolution 22 continue]
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@.org
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Commit-r3259-remove-most-checks-regarding-rou... Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.