data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f514/8f514b82ee55fccf73778012ed4590a7631dec40" alt=""
2011/3/20 WanMil <wmgcnfg@web.de>:
Yes. For this we need: * A preprocessing that converts the (complete) boundary file to a file format that allows to load parts only. This may be one file for each 1°x1° part. * mkgmap would have to load the relevant parts during tile processing. Each boundary area gets and unambigious id so we could merge them easily when a tile overlaps more than one 1°x1° boundary part. * The boundary information might be ignored while loading the tiles.
The same algorithm can be reused for coastline processing.
Wouldn't it make sense for the splitter - if we already have this boundary file - to split "tiles" primarily by political boundaries and only if one of them contains too many nodes, devide them by a straight line? I think I read on this list before that in theory, polygon-shaped tiles are no problem in garmin format. This would make it easier for mkgmap to assign the adress information and a meaningful "name" per tile. -Martin