data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/739d2/739d2032e49b3f843d9537a1b91054b2780cb66e" alt=""
Today I found another example of Unconnected ways. But to simplify the issue: - On my BIKE (bicycle) MAP the ways are Unconnected. - On my HIKE (foot) MAP the ways are Connected. Same OSM Data, same date (February 19, 2020), same mkgmap-r4452. I think, believe, I do see: Unclassified (south to north) is identical for both maps. But the secondary (west to east, gray) is relocated (bend) to connect to the unclassified in Hike Map. All crossing ways are connected correctly. No recent updates, since I wanted this example to be left unchanged. <http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/file/t344065/Bike_Unconnected_Hike_Connected.png> The scripts bicycle vs. foot are almost identical, same script except for some: If - Then - Else Statements selecting either "access_bike" or "access_foot" as include. if (map_type=1) then (highway=cycleway) & (sidewalk ~ '(both|left|right|yes)') {set highway=footway} (highway=cycleway) & (segregated=yes) {set highway=footway} end And on Hike Map I do render street-names, on Bike I don't. If (... IF...!) you want to look into this - again - I could run both scripts in debug mode: highway=* & osmid()=6016xxxx { echotags "BEGIN" } highway=* & osmid()=6016xxxx { echotags "END" } Attached OSM: Bike_Unconnected_Hike_Connected.osm <http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/file/t344065/Bike_Unconnected_Hike_Connected.osm> BTW, FWIW: OpenFietsMap (15-02-2020) is oké. I have seen this before: sometimes Me and OFM share the same issue, sometimes not. / Eric (AnkEric) -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html