Hi Nick, at first I would like to have some examples that evaluating addr:interpolation improves the housenumber search. As far as I know the usual addr:interpolation looks like: rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr n1--------------------n2 where r = road n1: addr:housenumber=12; addr:street=Main Street n2: addr:housenumber=24; addr:street=Main Street line: addr:interpolation=even In this case addr:interpolation is an additional information only if the road has a crossroads between n1 and n2. So something like this: r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr n1--------------------n2 In this case it would be possible to estimate the interpolated numbers of the road segment: r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr n1-------x y---------n2 Do you think this helps? Can you give some examples where it helps? WanMil
Hi Wanmil
Given that this excellent new address tool seems to be based on the min max values of housenumbers , I wonder how difficult is to use house numbers in addr:interpolation ? As a bonus you are given the odd & even values.
Or is it something you have on your todo list?
r Nick
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/addr-interpolation-tp5750158.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev