Thanks Gerd, the patch is in such an early state that I do not need to reproduce. The code will be changed completely so searching for bugs will start later on :-) WanMil
Hi WanMil,
sounds promising, so I tried it with niedersachsen data (split with --max-nodes=1600000) , but I get an assertion error: java -ea -jar d:\mkgmap_trunk\dist\mkgmap.jar --max-jobs \ --bounds=f:\osm\bounds_20121118.zip --location-autofill=is_in,nearest \ --route -c template.args
Time started: Thu Feb 14 22:21:17 CET 2013 java.lang.AssertionError: initial value is not positive: 0 at uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net.NumberPreparer.writeInitialValue(NumberPreparer.java:165) at uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net.NumberPreparer.fetchBitStream(NumberPreparer.java:69) at uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net.RoadDef.writeNet1(RoadDef.java:203) at uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net.NETFile.write(NETFile.java:66) at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.MapBuilder.makeMap(MapBuilder.java:219) at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.makeMap(MapMaker.java:97) at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.makeMap(MapMaker.java:61) at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main$1.call(Main.java:201) at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main$1.call(Main.java:198) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
Let me know if you need more data.
Gerd
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/PATCH-v1-Housenumber-search-for-OSM-data-tp57... Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev