> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 23:19:13 +0100
> From: popej@poczta.onet.pl
> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Optimizing MapSplitter
>
> Hi Gerd,
>
> I have prepared a tile in a way you have suggested. See files here:
> http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/224/test.7z
>
> Archive include following maps:
> 29483019.img - map compiled by mkgmap with mkgm-test.bat
> 29483018.img - map recompiled by cGPSmapper with TreSize=511
> 29483017.img - map recompiled by cGPSmapper with default TreSize
>
> I have included OSM data and mp source too. You can create img for
> device using included mk_device.bat.
>
> My observations are following:
>
> All maps are work quite good in device, it is not easy to tell which is
> the fastest.
>
> I can measure differences in redraw time between both version of
> cgpsmapper maps, the one with TreSize=511 can be up to 50% faster in
> some operations (measured in nuvi 1440).
>
> Map compiled with mkgmap is fast, as good as faster version of cgpsmapper.
>
> Since mkgmap creates fast maps, I'm not sure now, if subdivision size is
> so important. Maybe not, or maybe there is still some room for
> improvement in mkgmap?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrzej
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev