data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7646/a7646495c06fa40381e3ce865ce69df7c8208b5f" alt=""
Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> writes:
hi,
2009/7/29 Greg Troxel <gdt@ir.bbn.com>
Here's an example of what I'm talking about:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.3921&lon=-71.15861&zoom=16&layers=B000F...
yes, exactly this is what i want to have on my Garmin - without kidding. Better TOPO maps (for example TOPO 3 Pro Czech) have all buildings. You can guess where you can go by foot - usefull for Geocaching :].
...
[I am still trying to get maps of mass made, and my first step after that is to tweak unnamed buildings down in importance or out.]
i think good point should be to create two 'official' styles, CityNavigator and TOPO. There are plenty of useless thing in default style for road navigation and few missing things for TOPO.
What do you think?
That would be great. We have 'default' style now, which makes sense to make be the right thing for car-centric navigation, and another style for topo/detailed makes sense. I'll see what I can do once I get past whatever problem I'm having.