I was able to reproduce the problem but I don't see how this
could be style related, as it happens
when reading precompiled boundaries.
I thought that I fixed this problem already, but it seems that
the higher precision
is more likely to produce micro areas (< 1 x1 cm).
With r3089 I have added a test to ignore these micro areas when
reading or writing preprocessed
boundaries.
So, expect files that are a few percent smaller when using that
release :-)
I noticed that the current format of the precompiled boundaries
is not very
good reg. size: we save a lot of redundant information, e.g.
complex lines
shared by level 2, 4 , and 6 boundaries are saved for each level
and for each
area sharing it (say left and right one).
> Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 00:59:31 +0100
> From:
extremecarver@gmail.com
> To:
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: [mkgmap-dev] Style Dependant Bug
>
> Happens on France - seems to be somehow style dependant
as it doesn't
> happen on 1 out of my 2 styles, not sure about default
style. Any ideas?
> java.lang.AssertionError: boundary bbox doesn't fit into
quadtree
>
java.awt.Rectangle[x=250000,y=2050000,width=50000,height=50000]
>
java.awt.geom.Rectangle2D$Double[x=249999.99999999997,y=2073898.7167311574,w=2.9103830456733704E-11,h=2.3283064365386963
> E-10]
> at
>
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryQuadTree$Node.add(BoundaryQuadTree.java:603)
> at
>
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryQuadTree$Node.access$900(BoundaryQuadTree.java:392)
> at
>
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryQuadTree.readStreamQuadTreeFormat(BoundaryQuadTree.java:357)
> at
>
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryQuadTree.<init>(BoundaryQuadTree.java:109)
> at
>
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryUtil.loadQuadTreeFromStream(BoundaryUtil.java:474)
> at
>
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryUtil.loadQuadTrees(BoundaryUtil.java:174)
> at
>
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryGrid.init(BoundaryGrid.java:103)
> at
>
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryGrid.<init>(BoundaryGrid.java:66)
> at
>
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.LocationHook.end(LocationHook.java:98)
> at
>
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmReadingHooksChain.end(OsmReadingHooksChain.java:79)
> at
>
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.bin.OsmBinMapDataSource.load(OsmBinMapDataSource.java:63)
> at
>
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.load(OsmMapDataSource.java:127)
> at
>
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.loadFromFile(MapMaker.java:167)
> at
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.makeMap(MapMaker.java:63)
> at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main$1.call(Main.java:220)
> at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main$1.call(Main.java:216)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(Unknown
Source)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)
> at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown
> Source)
> at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown
> Source)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
>
> --
> keep on biking and discovering new trails
>
> Felix
> openmtbmap.org &
www.velomap.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev