> Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 19:40:31 +0100
> From: wmgcnfg@web.de
> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Bug (?) in performance branch
>
> Ok, I've checked the bounding box too and got the same results like you.
> It's ok to ignore them because they will not appear in the resulting map.
>
> There is one little exceptions: A way having no point within the
> bounding box but intersecting the bounding box will appear in the map.
> But the cases are quite rare (~1 way in 10 tiles) so we can ignore that.

Okay. It should also be possible to calculate a "virtual" point, e.g. the middle
of the intersection of the bounding box of that way and the saver bounding box.

Gerd


>
> WanMil
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > with my test data, all of them were ways that had no points within the
> > savers
> > bounding box. Is it okay to ignore those?
> >
> > Gerd
> >
> >
> > WanMil wrote
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> the performance branch does not find any bounds information for a few
> >> ways and nodes. It's about 10 ways per tile where this happens.
> >>
> >> Having on look on them some are well explainable because they are
> >> located in the North Sea. But others are located completely within a
> >> country (e.g. in the middle of France or Dutch). From my understanding
> >> they must be assigned at least with the country information beause these
> >> countries do not have holes.
> >>
> >> The following patch creates a GPX file for each node/way that is not
> >> assigned with any bounds information. This makes it quite easy to check
> >> where the errorneous ways/nodes are located.
> >>
> >> WanMil
> >>
> >> Index: src/uk/me/parabola/mkgmap/reader/osm/LocationHook.java
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- src/uk/me/parabola/mkgmap/reader/osm/LocationHook.java (revision 2234)
> >> +++ src/uk/me/parabola/mkgmap/reader/osm/LocationHook.java (working copy)
> >> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> >> */
> >> package uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm;
> >>
> >> +import java.util.Collections;
> >> import java.util.HashSet;
> >> import java.util.Iterator;
> >> import java.util.List;
> >> @@ -24,6 +25,7 @@
> >> import uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryQuadTree;
> >> import uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryUtil;
> >> import uk.me.parabola.util.EnhancedProperties;
> >> +import uk.me.parabola.util.GpxCreator;
> >>
> >> public class LocationHook extends OsmReadingHooksAdaptor {
> >> private static final boolean PRINT_RESULT = false;
> >> @@ -157,6 +159,8 @@
> >> if (elem instanceof Node){
> >> Node node = (Node) elem;
> >> tags = search(node.getLocation());
> >> + if (tags == null)
> >> + GpxCreator.createGpx(GpxCreator.getGpxBaseName()+"n"+elem.getId(),
> >> Collections.singletonList(((Node) elem).getLocation()));
> >> }
> >> else if (elem instanceof Way){
> >> Way way = (Way) elem;
> >> @@ -181,8 +185,10 @@
> >> break;
> >> }
> >> }
> >> - if (tags == null)
> >> + if (tags == null) {
> >> + GpxCreator.createGpx(GpxCreator.getGpxBaseName()+"w"+way.getId(),
> >> way.getPoints());
> >> ++cntwayNotFnd;
> >> + }
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (tags == null){
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> >> mkgmap-dev@.org
> >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Bug-in-performance-branch-tp5535442p5535456.html
> > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > _______________________________________________
> > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev