data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/968e2/968e263046578ab884b00b63dcd9f38a68e6de01" alt=""
Hi Gerd Given that the overview map is for use on computers with 100s of G of disk space and the main map will be a G or so, can an extra few 10K or so in the overview map really be a problem for anyone? Building British-and-ireland, with default style and just --gmapsupp (ie no index or routing) gmapsupp.img is 542M and osmmap.img is 220k. With --order-by-decreasing-area they increase to 603M (11.3%) and 228k (3.6%). With routing, indexing, code page 1252 and other typical options, gmapsupp.imp might be double the size and so the percentage increase would be a lot less but not significantly different for osmmap.img. Ticker On Sat, 2021-01-23 at 11:29 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi Ticker,
outch, sorry! It seems I created my patch without any testing :( I'm still not happy with the handling of the --order-by-decreasing -area option. I wonder why nobody else comments on this. Either nobody cares about the size of the overview map or nobody else tried any of the patches. Since this is a major change I hoped for more feedback.
Gerd