Hi Thorsten,

thanks for the nice feedback. I am now working on the
code for "Turn restrictions with role=via ways ".

I am not sure how complex the changes are, so maybe we
should call 3116 the new stable version.

Gerd

> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:06:58 +0100
> From: kukuk@suse.de
> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: [mkgmap-dev] Feedback on mkgmap r3111
>
>
> Hi,
>
> during the last two days I had the chance to compare a lot
> of long distance routing of my Garmin 62s (Firmware 5.30, so newest
> one with activity routing) with my map generated with mkgmap r3111
> and a commercial built in car navigation system.
>
> The routing on long distance between both devices was the same.
> The difference between the km the 62s calculated and we drove was
> about 1%, the time about 3%.
> Inside of cities on short routes the 62s did choose the better
> routes, but I think that's only because the OSM data was more up-to-date.
>
> So the "NOD127" branch was really a very good job!
>
> There were only two negative aspects:
> - the 5.30 firmware for the 62s is a nightmare in stability and
> usability :(
> - if you enable "avoid u-turns", the 62s will not only avoid them,
> but really never does them, even if it means there is no legal way
> to continue. Means in two situations we were suggested to use a cycleway
> or a footway. That's reproduceable with the 62s, but not with MapSource,
> so I think it's a firmware bug.
> (if somebody wants to try: Route to "Tigerpalast" in Frankfurt a. Main and
> continue with Routing to "Lange Strasse 30-36" with "avoid u-turn"
> enabled, car, fastest route).
>
>
> Thorsten
>
> --
> Thorsten Kukuk, Senior Architect SLES & Common Code Base
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg
> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev