Hi, I am not sure regarding the sizes of the area. At least one of the riverbank polygons is a multipolygon with two outer rings. The size calculation treats each outer ring separately, without subtracting the area of inner rings. @Ticker: Is that intended? Besides that I think that the examples show that one needs both a draw order for types and size ordering to get reasonable results. Gerd rheinskipper1000 wrote
I eagerly awaited the order-by-decreasing-area option.
Results are a bit different than I expected at the moment:
My style contains:
waterway=riverbank [0x10302 resolution 20] seamark:type=fairway {name 'fairway'} [0x10307 level 2]
Unfortunately the smaller (white) fairway polygons are still partly covered by (blue) riverbank polygons: https://mega.nz/#!NN8UWDCK!LeR_h1cJeBVDGMxFeUf48l_qARfVdKXTMzRoHjy_rEw https://mega.nz/#!0B9AgZQJ!AZcQ9zHktIQ0D9Uq_nb_gRGG0eDGxCQaT0XuQJaebWc
Von: svn commit Gesendet: Freitag, 11. November 2016 17:11 An:
mkgmap-svn@.org
;
mkgmap-dev@.org
Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Commit r3702: sortAreas_v5.patch: Add option--order-by-decreasing-area
Version mkgmap-r3702 was committed by gerd on Fri, 11 Nov 2016
sortAreas_v5.patch: Add option --order-by-decreasing-area
Patch by Ticker Berkin, slightly modifed
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=3702 _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@.org
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@.org
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Commit-r3702-sortAreas-v5-patch-Add-option-or... Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.