Hi ,
the current wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction#Tagsdocuments these restriction texts:
no_right_turn / no_left_turn / no_u_turn / no_straight_on / only_right_turn / only_left_turn / only_straight_on / no_entry / no_exit
current mkgmap allows typos like
no_turn_right , no_turn_xyz (anything that starts with no_turn)
as well as
all strings that start with only_turn
It prints a warning for them, but doesn't ignore them.
I found 14 no_turn_on_red restrictions like this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2033334
which probably should not be interpreted like normal restrictions, so I think mkgmap should not accept generics.
OK?
Gerd
> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 13:23:35 +0200
> From: kukuk@suse.de
> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] restriction relations with wrong restriction text
>
> On Sun, Apr 13, Gerd Petermann wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > should mkgmap ignore if a no_left_turn restriction doesn't describe a no_left_turn?
> >
> > For example, look at this
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3414378
>
> That's around the corner of my old flat, I know the area very well.
> The text is correct, the to way is wrong. I will fix that.
> I think in such cases you should ignore the restriction and
> print a warning, so that people can fix it.
>
> > In short: the restriction should be ignored after printing a warning.
>
> Correct.
>
> Thorsten
>
> --
> Thorsten Kukuk, Senior Architect SLES & Common Code Base
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg
> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev