23 Mar
2010
23 Mar
'10
9:45 p.m.
On 23.03.2010 21:45, Mark Burton wrote:
Hello Felix,
Could it be that the new for polygons "8" is much much bigger compared to the old (using patch) "8"??? Or that the patch was not enacted on resolution 24??
Err, why?
Mark _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Just again, I think your implementation really broke something. Using: --min-polygon-size=1 I still miss loads of houses (that are at least 5-10 pixel big). --min-polygon-size=200 makes maps still smaller and missing lotta more polygons, so in principle this option is working (and syntax correct).