On 08.12.2009 00:17, Chris-Hein Lunkhusen wrote:
Mark Burton schrieb:
The attached patch allows you to add either unpaved=yes/true/1 or paved=no/false/0 to a way and then it will be ignored for routing purposes when the GPS has been told to avoid unpaved roads.
Not sure if those are the best tags to use - any thoughts?
I think the most used tag is surface=unpaved, but as usual we can do this in the style file.
highway=*& (surface=unpaved | surface=dirt | surface=sand | surface=ground | surface=gravel) {add unpaved=yes}
Chris
Well I prefer if it it is kept like right now, and surface=* is not automatically considered as unpaved avoidance and the tag itself is not present in OSM database. This leaves more choice in the style-file to abuse the unpaved tag (and allows the choice if for example tracktype=grade2 is considered to be avoided or not via "avoid unpaved roads". The default style-file of course should have something like below: highway=*& (surface=unpaved | surface=dirt | surface=sand | surface=ground | surface=gravel | tracktype=grade2 | tracktype=grade3 | tracktype=grade4 | tracktype=grade5 | sac_scale=* | smothness= ........) {add unpaved=yes}
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev