Hi Gerd, On Mon, Apr 02, Gerd Petermann wrote:
I did not find a good explanation for the small difference in the numbers: osmconvert reported 2518069911 nodes, which is ~ 2.518.069.911 -(2^31 - 1) = 370.586.264 - 2^31 + 370.586.264 =* -1.776.897.384* but splitter r200 reported * -1.776.905.107* nodes The formatting routine is not the reason. Any ideas?
The SRTM data has some duplicate nodes (duplicate as of same lat/lon, but different ID). Does one of the tools ignore them? At least mkgmap warns about them. Else no, I have no idea.
What is the value that the patched splitter reports for the coords occupancy? Here is what I see for a small file: ... *********************************************************** Final statistics *********************************************************** Needed dictionary entries: 25 of 65535 coords occupancy MAP occupancy: 7.544.535 ...
With the patched version: Needed dictionary entries: 414 of 65535 coords occupancy MAP occupancy: 1.014.076.753 Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)