Hi Nelson, there is no special java code in mkgmap to treat aeroways. I guess you don't use the default style, so I can't say what goes wrong. A good tool to find out what mkgmap writes to the img file is GPSMapEdit. Use it to open the corresponding img file and double click into the area you want to analyse. It shows you what Garmin type the area has. Press escape to close the dialog box followed by delete to remove that polygon. Repeat this process until GPSMapEdit shows something like "Area of map coverage (0x4b, polygon)" If you do this for both img files (the good and the bad one) you should be able to find out what's different. Gerd
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 23:45:05 -0300 From: naoliv@gmail.com To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with aeroway=aerodrome as a relation
Could somehow mkgmap have an issue with aeroway=aerodrome as a relation? (instead a simple closed way)
For example, this airport http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90834745 have its internal grasses properly represented like here: http://cocardl.com.br/pv/viracopos.jpg
On the other hand, this airport http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3896781 seems to overlap every internal feature (like grasses): http://cocardl.com.br/pv/galeao.jpg
Is mkgmap giving different treatments for aeroway=aerodrome as a closed way and as a relation? _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev