Hi all,
my findings are:
Including the new DEM-Features, there are two ways for basecamp to provide altitude-profile for routes:
A )Based on DEM-files (which is the preferred way within basecamp)
B) Based on contour-data, but only if (regarding mkgmap) Option Show-profile is set to 1 and A) is not avaiable
BTW: I´m not sure if mkgmap is setting the wrong option in the tdb-file or TDB-Editor shows the wrong value:
TDB-file with toggled show-profile-option in mkgmap results in toggled DEM-parameter in TDB-Editor (and/or tdb-file?)
Another finding is, that the altitude – Profile with DEM (produced with same hgt-files) has a higher „resolution“ (as expected) and the commulated attitudes (Höhenmeter) are totally different (up to 2x, not to be expected). The smaller one is near to reality (Knowledge).
Regards,
Andreas
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: Gerd Petermann
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2018 09:52
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] option --show-profiles and DEM