Hi Minko what about 0xa ? Or was that meant to be 0x1a ? Gerd
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 11:22:33 +0200 From: ligfietser@online.nl To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding routable/non-routable types.
that sounds like the original list was not so bad: //return type >= 0x01 && type <= 0x13 || type == 0x1a || type == 0x1b || type == 0x16; what about 0x16, 0x1a and 0x1b ?
0xa is in the range 0x01 - 0x13. Is this really an exception? And is it the only one?
Hi Gerd
0x16: routing error 0x1a: no routing error (double checked this) 0x1b: routing error
So it's weird that only 0x1a shows no routing error. Better keep the original list then to be safe?
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev