Hi Gerd Not sure what you mean here. Only complete polygons, either from closed ways or generated by multipolygon get to be interpreted by 'polygons' style processing. Ticker On Sun, 2019-01-06 at 16:58 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi all, Just to make that clear: A way with highway=pedestrian is that is not closed will only be treated by polygon rules when it is part of a multipolygon. So, the question is how many of those don't have an area=yes and how many of the latter probably should have area=yes.
Gerd
________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi <lomastrolo@gmail.com> Gesendet: Sonntag, 6. Januar 2019 17:46 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements
Il giorno dom, 06/01/2019 alle 12.45 +0000, Ticker Berkin ha scritto:
Hi Lorenzo
I know that the OSM definition says square should have area=yes, but I find a vast number where there is no area tag and they seem to be square/piazza, eg
This is a multipolygon. The current rule to handle this with the mkgmap:mp_created tag is fine for a default style in my opinion.
With Italy data from July 2018, I get about 5000 highway=pedestrian polygons without an area tag, and, from a small sample, about 1 in 3 look like piazza.
The only effect is that a polygon is generated, it doesn't effect routes. I prefer to see the possible square rendered.
I don't. 1 in 3 correct is not so good :)
Ticker
Lorenzo
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev