Am 16.12.2012 13:46, schrieb WanMil:
A relation with route=ferry should be handled, because there are some (many ?) ferry-routes are tagged as such a relation and member are empty ways. Can you give an example of such a route and how you work with it in mkgmap? Why must all parts of the relation be complete in a tile? This example has no empty way, but only a waterway=seaway and two route=ferry-relation
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/124862398 I'm using in relations-file: type=route & route=ferry { apply { set route=ferry ; set rrk_name='$(rrk_name),${name}' | '${name}' } } and in lines: route=ferry & name=* { set mkgmap:ferry=yes } [0x1b road_class=3 road_speed=2 resolution 16] route=ferry & name!=* { set mkgmap:ferry=yes ; set name='${rrk_name}' } [0x1b road_class=3 road_speed=2 resolution 16] There is one problem unsolved: If way is tagged with a name and rrk_name is different (e.g. second ferry or two relations etc.), then name is taken only from the way. Henning