I would interpret that the other way round. If surface=paved, concrete, ... treat it as paved, no matter what tracktype is. I think tracktype is very often misinterpreted by mappers, and wiki doesn't clarify it much either. Additionally, tracktype>1 may be an old tag placed before track was paved, in the same way that you can find a lot of highway=residential, tertiary, etc + tracktype=* El 09/02/17 a las 11:25, lig fietser escribió:
My OFM will mark them as unpaved. The combination of track and grade3 counts more than the surface. I think the current default rules assign them also as unpaved. Your patch v3 too, is that correct?
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gerd wrote:
And what about combinations of surface meaning paved with tracktype? The wiki says "Usually ... " or "Almost always an unpaved track" for most tracktype values.
I see quite a lot of ways with highway=track & surface=concrete:lanes & tracktype=grade3 in my Niedersachsen: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/lNI
I think those are not unpaved, no matter how nice it is to cycle on them;-)
Gerd