Re: [mkgmap-dev] change handling of railway=abandoned

I think part of the problem is that railway=abandonded is not a statement either way about whether it is reasonably physically traversable on foot whether there is any right of access so I guess I don't see why a way with railway=abandonded and no highway tags should be presumed routable in the first place. I guess the real issue is that garmin thinks it is? (Also, for US people, note that OSM's definition of abandoned is different from the US definition. The US definition is a legal thing, and some rails that are US-abandoned have tracks present. Nothing to do in mkgmap, but if you are a US railfan and not an OSM expert, you'll assume wrong.)