I think this is not required as long as mkgmap is not able to handle all of such relations:
* subrelations: I think subrelations are not handled by mkgmap so they can be ignored completely by keep-complete. (Keep the code, sometime mkgmap will handle them ;-)
no problem, I can just comment out the call of markParentRels()
* relations: I found code for the following relation types only: multipolygon boundary (is ignored by splitter?) restriction through_route I think all other relations can be ignored by keep-complete. (I don't know about the special marine code...)
What do you think about? Any objections?
Up to now, splitter r260 doesn't ignore any relation. It just has a special handling for multipolygon relations to find enclosed tiles. This was previously also done for boundaries, but that turned out to be too much data. Gerd