HI Joris, I do not think we should be hard coding non-standard tags into mkgmap, even if there are a number of them in some countries. cycleway:left=opposite, cycleway:left=opposite_lane and cycleway:left=opposite_track are all non-standard and to me don't make any sense. I suggest you add something like cycleway:left=opposite | cycleway:left=opposite_lane | cycleway:left=opposite_track | cycleway:right=opposite | cycleway:right =opposite_lane | cycleway:right =opposite_track { add cycleway=opposite } to your lines file if you want to use them. Cheers, Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joris Bo [mailto:jorisbo@hotmail.com] Sent: 09 February 2021 11:09 To: Development list for mkgmap <mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] opposite-cycleways option Hi Gerd, Indeed short way of saying cycleway:left=opposite_lane or cycleway:left=opposite_track Like you have cycleway=opposite | cycleway=opposite_lane | cycleway=opposite_track | I would also think the others are enough but when I checked taginfo it is more commonly used then cycleway:left=opposite_track So seems valid to me... Met vriendelijke groeten, Joris Bo jorisbo@hotmail.com -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> Namens Gerd Petermann Verzonden: dinsdag 9 februari 2021 10:37 Aan: Development list for mkgmap <mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> Onderwerp: Re: [mkgmap-dev] opposite-cycleways option Hi Joris, I just wonder what cycleway:left=opposite means. Same with the already supported cycleway:left=opposite_lane. Do you know a place where this makes sense? Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Joris Bo <jorisbo@hotmail.com> Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Februar 2021 10:20 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] opposite-cycleways option Hi Gerd, I came accross tagging cycleway:left=opposite cycleway:right=opposite Overpass says that there are about 3200 ways in France/Belgium for this situation These are not mentioned in your e-mail post as possible tagging to create synthesize roads, if I'am correct Would it be possible to add these options? Mentioned in your post oneway:bicycle=no | bicycle:oneway=no | cycleway=opposite | cycleway=opposite_lane | cycleway=opposite_track | cycleway:left=opposite_lane | cycleway:right=opposite_lane | cycleway:left=opposite_track | cycleway:right=opposite_track Met vriendelijke groeten, Joris Bo jorisbo@hotmail.com -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> Namens Gerd Petermann Verzonden: maandag 8 februari 2021 16:17 Aan: Development list for mkgmap <mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> Onderwerp: Re: [mkgmap-dev] opposite-cycleways option Hi Joris, the java code creates a copy of the original way and removes various possibly existing access tags, it sets access=no, bicycle=yes,oneway=no,mkgmap:synthesised=yes I would not add foot=* as the original might have something equivalent to foot=no. In fact there should be no need for any special handling in the style unless you want to assign a special typ. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Joris Bo <jorisbo@hotmail.com> Gesendet: Montag, 8. Februar 2021 13:30 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] opposite-cycleways option Hi, I'm trying to improve routing for my bicycle and the oneway allowed for bicycles by using the --make-opposite-cycleway option But I was wondering what the criteria are for creating such extra cycleways. I have read some earlier posts an 'll found Gerd's comments on http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2014q2/020818.html But the manual does not state what is actually implemented. Is there some more documentation somewhere? As far as I understand now * Only if a highway has oneway=yes AND (some variants of oneway:bicycle = no) then * Mkgmap will create an extra highway line with (mkgmap:synthesised = yes) * Within my style file I'll pick up the mkgmap:synthesised=yes and assign an "invisible overlay routeable highway" line and then * Remove the oneway-tag (which applies to cars) * set mkgmap:bicycle/foot=yes * set mkgmap:car/hgv/bus/delivery=no Is that correct? Thx for helping me out Met vriendelijke groeten, Joris Bo jorisbo@hotmail.com<mailto:jorisbo@hotmail.com> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev